Archives for category: Zombies

Pasted below is the Bill of Rights and some other links for easy reference.

Another school shooting has provoked the usual knee jerk response to violate the Second Article of the Bill of Rights, which is:

“Article the fourth… A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

The defenders of infringing this right usually try these arguments:

  1.  Some countries have banned guns and have less school shootings.
  2. Guns are part of American national Identity, which needs to change.
  3. FOR THE CHILDREN

I’ll start with argument #1, because it is compelling on its face, but lacks substance in the real world.

Let’s talk Union Shops. You have seven clothing makers in an area. If they are all owned separately, each employer is in competition with the others for the best employees. Naturally, the best will gravitate to where they are treated best, compensated best, etc. So, the best employer sets a standard by which the others must calibrate how they treat employees.

So it is with countries. If England decided to start brutalizing their best and brightest, at this point, these people have an escape route, America, which for the purposes of this blog will be considered the “union shop”.  People might say “Oh, immigration is being restricted.” That is for the poor and huddled masses. The best and brightest are highly mobile, sought after, and usually have capital.

So there is something to the notion that America is a beacon of human rights. We elevate the rest of the world, because we exist as an escape hatch for the all-stars from other countries. My premise is the best and brightest are always welcome, the immigration rules don’t exist for them. This is real world stuff–we took in Nazi scientists after WW2, as did other countries. The best and the brightest are mobile.

So, by this logic, if America lowers its standards of Freedom, that is restricts the Rights stated in the Constitution, we make countries all over the world more likely to lower their standards as well.

In other words, our Constitution benefits people who don’t live here, but in foreign countries. We act as an example to the rest of the world, and as a threat to countries who treat their best people like garbage.

Argument 2- The reason for the 2nd Amendment is because of America’s cowboy history, and this should change because we are no longer cowboys.

I hear even “conservatives” spout this one, even that British guy who is always on Tucker Carlson. This is completely wrong, and painfully shallow.

The reason for the right to bear arms is the rights to property and free speech depend on it.  Can’t put it any simpler than that. If you disagree, you need to try living in the real world for a while.

What right does our government have to bear arms? Well, the right was allocated to them by the People. If the government does not act in accordance with the Constitution, the People have the duty and necessity to take the right back. After all, it is the lawful right of the People to begin with, otherwise the right could never have been allocated by the People in the first place.

I don’t hunt. I think shooting little animals is barbaric, and would certainly do so for food, but for sport? There are more efficient ways to control the deer population.

I support the Right to bear arms because I don’t trust groups. Individuals I can usually reason with, but the collective is a monster. Look at how governments and corporations act. They cower behind each other and vote heinous acts. The USA government invades countries when jet fuel incinerates structural steel. Madeleine Albright said the death of a half million Iraqi children due to sanctions was “worth it“. What did these deaths accomplish? Why worth it? Did CNN ever have a Town Hall meeting for these half million dead kids? No, of course not.

American kids are different though, you insist, as they force your defenseless, unarmed family into boxcars. I tried to warn you, but you were oh so smart. Look at you now.

3. FOR THE CHILDREN.

This is indeed a good point. Let me propose this–we take a thousand kids who would never, ever, shoot up a school, a 1000 kids who would, survey them as to why, and have real statistical data to support correctives actions to American culture. Violence is a systemic, endemic, cultural problem.

If the data shows that people who won’t shoot up schools have certain commonalities that differentiate them from would-be shooters, can we change the Constitution for that? You never read about committed Christian kids shooting up schools do you? Probably never happen. Should we make Christianity mandatory in schools? FOR THE CHILDREN? Might work.

What about kids who are firebugs, or if they can’t get a gun will get a machete, or make a bomb?  Evil doers find a way. Remember the Weather Underground? Not Christians, but these bomb makers and murderers were committed Communists.

In fact, most of these shooters are Left leaning, at least. I hesitate to say Democrats, because I know many fine people who are Democrats, but if Leftism was outlawed, schools might be safer–FOR THE CHILDREN.

My view of reality is reality based. It gets rough out there. I support the Second Amendment because I honestly believe children have a better chance of remaining free in a society where the average person has the right to bear arms. American Slaves could not bear arms. Ever wonder why? Irish people were forbidden from bearing arms by the British, and not long after was The Great Famine, or Irish Holocaust/Genocide, where fifteen million or so Irish people perished from hunger in a land that was a net producer and exporter of food during the worst of it.

Your life matters, my life matters. Don’t ever think that someone is not out there scheming to take it away from you if they perceive a benefit, or maybe they are just sociopaths who like to kill (it happens).

Live free or die? That is the choice we are faced with, but it is not really a choice. If we renounce our freedom for temporary safety, our physical deaths will soon follow, or the bill for our cowardice will be passed on to our children.

The three laws of Thermodynamics for Dummies:

  1.  You Can’t Win
  2. You Can’t Break Even
  3. You Have to Play

Natural Laws trump human hubris every time.

 

I have written about this topic before here and here.

Transcription of the 1789 Joint Resolution of Congress Proposing 12 Amendments to the U.S. Constitution

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all, or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.

ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.

Article the first… After the first enumeration required by the first article of the Constitution, there shall be one Representative for every thirty thousand, until the number shall amount to one hundred, after which the proportion shall be so regulated by Congress, that there shall be not less than one hundred Representatives, nor less than one Representative for every forty thousand persons, until the number of Representatives shall amount to two hundred; after which the proportion shall be so regulated by Congress, that there shall not be less than two hundred Representatives, nor more than one Representative for every fifty thousand persons.

Article the second… No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of Representatives shall have intervened.

Article the third… Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Article the fourth… A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Article the fifth… No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Article the sixth… The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Article the seventh… No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Article the eighth… In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Article the ninth… In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Article the tenth… Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Article the eleventh… The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Article the twelfth… The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

ATTEST,

Frederick Augustus Muhlenberg, Speaker of the House of Representatives
John Adams, Vice-President of the United States, and President of the Senate
John Beckley, Clerk of the House of Representatives.
Sam. A Otis Secretary of the Senate

Advertisements

Recently, the failed Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton released a book entitled WHAT HAPPENED, about her 2016 Presidential run. The book has caused some buzz, and it caused me to speculate as to exactly why she did lose.  What are my qualifications to write about this? Actually, if you review my blog over the past few years, my political analysis is as good or better than most of the so-called experts. So why did she lose?

(As an aside, check out this Sinead O’Connor clip. Not a Trump fan, Sinead is sending a videogram to Doctor Phil, who tried to help her. I like Irish people, being of Irish descent myself, but I knew Dr. Phil was getting in over his head with Sinead. She says she tried to kill herself eight times in a year. Probably needs to quit swilling the booze more than anything else. Sorry, I was listening to her rant while writing this.)

Anyway, why did Hillary lose? Here is an interview with Vox she did which gave me some insights. The tipoff was when she was talking about some ideas she had which she had kept a lid on, but implies she might have rolled out if she had won.

One was the program they have in Alaska, where they give people who live there a few bucks from the production of oil and other natural resources. I think we are supposed to say at that point, “O, free money! We should have elected Hillary!” I mean, you can’t go wrong threatening to pass out money for nothing. So why did she keep this idea under her hat? First I heard of it was this VOX interview. So here is why I think Hillary lost.

She was looking ahead to 2020.

Bernie and Trump had the leeway to make promises because they seemed like long shots, but Hillary knew whatever promises she made would haunt her when she ran for re-election. I don’t think Hillary and her campaign are lying–they really had no idea they were going to lose, they were totally overconfident, and figured they did not need or want to handicap themselves with new ideas which voters would hold them to. They outsmarted themselves by trying to make sure she was a two-termer. They completely underestimated Trump, and figured they would coast through without really even campaigning very hard.

One can nitpick with me here. Hillary’s campaign did cancel their scheduled fireworks display on election night, which has been interpreted as a sign of anticipating defeat. I don’t know why they cancelled. Maybe it sent an arrogant message, and they cancelled to get rid of the perception?

Hillary was used to winning elections, so she figured she’d win this one. To digress, it points to poor leadership skills to be so arrogant, but this blog is an attempt at an objective analysis, not Hillary bashing.

Hillary would have gotten a few votes by talking about bringing the Alaska program to the rest of the country, but she never would have done it. She’s a Big Government person–once she gets the money, the way to build power is to be in charge of splitting up the loot to cronies, not giving it back to citizens. Yet she talks about it now because she’s got nothing to lose. She sees now she should have judged how sick people were of failed policies, and promised some bread and circuses, even if she had to backpeddle once elected.

At this point let me point out the obvious–there are those who say the Russians stuffed the ballot box. That is their right if they want to believe this. However, these same people don’t want to really delve and open up the voter rolls, or make it a requirement to show some ID to vote. I would settle for a library card myself–you have to show residency to get one. I think our elections are very vulnerable to fraud, but if the Russians sent in fake voters or something, I don’t think the top Democrats are sincere about finding this out, which makes me doubt the veracity of the Russian story.

To recap, one of the elements of Hillary’s loss was supreme arrogance. They thought Trump was pushover. Indeed, Hillary’s campaign actively supported Trump in the GOP Primary–they wanted to run against him. Bill Clinton even snidely suggested Trump was a DNC plant to sabotage the GOP. I also think the Clinton Camp always had the Billy Bush tape, and figured they could use that to destroy Trump at the best moment. Trump countered that pretty well. Like boxing, elections are about matchups, and it is tough for Hillary to go after an opponent for participating and enabling sexual harassment. It just is. So, Hillary never troubled herself to go out on a limb, because she knew from experience her empty promises would be used against her, and she didn’t need to make any, so she avoided making them beyond the standard meaningless platitudes she specializes in (Sorry, I hate her), point being to have little baggage for 2020.

So, there is my thought. I haven’t read anybody else saying it, so I figured I would blog about it. There were many other factors involved, of course, beyond Hillary already planning her 2020 run. They were like Rocky in Rocky 3, after beating a string of palookas, he lost their eye of the tiger. Meanwhile, Mr. T. (Trump) was training hard and talking smack, calling her out. When Hillary’s Mickey died (Seth Rich, sorry, I told you I hate her)…well, Mickey has no analog here, but I hope you get my point anyway. (Adrienne was Huma, so there’s that).

What else? Hillary should have run as Gore’s VP in 2000. That was her path. Lieberman added nothing to that ticket, and George W. Bush is a President this country could have done without. Odds are she and Gore hated each other, and maybe she figured (correctly) Gore would lose and she would get the nod in 2004 after being Senator  for a couple years. Whatever. At this point, what difference does it make? Yet, Hillary wrote a book, so may as well join in the post election autopsy. Success has a thousand fathers, but failure is an orphan, as Mussolini’s son once said.  Hillary seems most interested in blaming other for her loss. I expect if she had won, she would have devoted much time to blaming others for her failures as well. That be how bitches like her operate.

 

Here’s an interesting tidbit about one of the funders of Planned Parenthood in Missouri, The Church of Satan:

As an interesting aside, Satanism has a millennial history of association with child sacrifice, which makes the Temple’s financial and moral support of abortion a natural activity for the sect. The Israelites struggled against the worship of Baal, another name for the Phoenician god Moloch, who demanded child sacrifices of his followers and was associated with the devil. The prophet Jeremiah spoke explicitly of the sacrifice of children to Baal, warning his readers that God finds such behavior abhorrent.

Baal was often identified with Satan, especially in the form of “Beezebul” (Lord Baal), the prince of demons, which literally meant the “Lord of the Flies.” Jesus Christ was accused of obtaining powers for his miracles from “Beelzebul,” whom he identified as Satan.”

The Bible is riddled with tales of human sacrifice. King Solomon even built a temple to Baal on a hill overlooking Jerusalem, ostensibly for one of his pagan wives. I often take what I think are numerologically significant days for occultists and try to give a heads-up on them. April 19th and May 1st are obvious ones on which it is hard for Luciferians to resist offering up a holocaust, but there are others.

Accept for a moment that our government, indeed the world government is riddled with occultists. It’s a paradigm shift, so I am going to insert one of my book covers here:

image001

Above is the second book cover I ever made, for DEAD TO RIGHTS, the second of my Zombie World Order Trilogy. Let’s discuss this.

This is the street grid of Washington DC., over which I layered a classic picture of Moloch. I placed the pentagram between Moloch’s ears at the natural  pentagram formed by the intersection of streets in the DC street layout. I added some other effects. One eye of Moloch is blocked out, a nod to Illuminatti symbolism, and the “G” in Rights is strategically placed to show how important the letter G is in the meaning, G being used extensively in Freemasonry.

There used to be a website, TheCuttingEdge.com, supposedly run by ex-CIA, ex-Masons who converted to Christianity and who wanted to expose the occult, and they took a deep dive into the occult significance of the layout of Washington D.C. I think a knife company bought the domain name. There used to be better stuff on the Internet, though you can still read a lot about this if you look.

My point is–I’m hip, and have been doing what I can to expose this stuff myself for quite some time. Occultists gain power (they believe) if their spell is cast publicly (in plain sight), and only the initiated know the meaning. Well, the street map of Washington D.C. is a giant homage to Baal, and don’t think I didn’t cry when I figured this out back in 1999, because I did.

Also from the article referenced above:

“…The Satanic Temple has often lent its muscle to pro-abortion efforts alongside Planned Parenthood, and in this case has pressured Missouri legislators and worked through the courts to bring about a relaxing of abortion restrictions, according to reports. One of the Temple’s fundamental tenets is that “One’s body is inviolable, subject to one’s own will alone…”

I think a thorough philosophical examination of that statement will be rewarded with the expected insights into the Eugenics Movement. I played this game out several moves ahead, and basically it anticipates the phrase *”nutzlose Fresser,”  or useless eaters.  The Body Politic is a common phrase, so if the will of the majority of the Body Politic dictates the extermination of “useless” eaters”, the less powerful members of the body, the aged, infirm, handicapped, the unborn, or whoever the majority will deems undesirable, the Body Politic has the right to subjugate the will of the lesser members to the will of the majority.

*”Nutzlose Fresser,”  or useless eaters is a phrase supposedly coined by the Nazis, at least as applied to human beings.

Atheists won’t admit the existence of the Human Soul, so the only difference between a human being at 6 weeks after conception as opposed to a 6 year old child or sixty-year old man is stage of development. Therefore, once you accept the notion that the stronger will at a particular timeline is supreme to another person’s will to live, you can fire up the gas chambers with a clear conscience if you are an atheist.

Satanists, however, believe in the existence of the human soul, so what is their excuse? They are trying to impose geometry on nature, dehumanizing all in the process, and also believe they benefit from human sacrifices, or holocausts. The “trash” from an abortion clinic, what doesn’t get sold for parts, winds up in an incinerator ultimately.  Holocaust means sacrifice by fire.

People who support abortion and are religious typically have some ridiculous theological justification for this. Secular Jews typically support abortion rights. They say there is a “Hall of Souls” and you get handed a soul as you exit the womb. People who claim absolute knowledge of the human condition must be treated as ticking time bombs. They are deranged. Advances in science are treating people to all kinds of new ultrasound and prenatal pictures of living, breathing, kicking babies in the womb. Only a mystic of the last resort would see these images and argue otherwise, also how about people born of Cesarean sections? No womb exit means no soul, right?  Shovel that somewhere else.

My Mom always talks about this guy, Dinesh D’Souza, but I always associated him with The National Review and assumed he had some disabling mental or moral handicap.  My Mom donated money to Jim and Tammy Faye Baker, the air conditioned doghouse TV evangelists, and still likes them. Also gave money to Father Bruce Ritter, the priest who set out to help hookers get out of the business but wound up setting up apartments for his gay lovers with the money he collected. Meanwhile, I couldn’t get money off her for the bus in high school.  However, she is right about Dinesh in certain respects. I never endorse anyone wholeheartedly, but the documentary film “Hillary’s America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party”Hillary’s America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party” is definitely worth seeing. He’s there. He’s on Twitter talking about abortion clinics, Margaret Sanger, Eugenics, Occultists. Sometimes you have to stretch the string to get a sweeter note. Locking this guy up for some really stupid campaign donation offense was the dumbest thing the occultists ever did. You take away a person’s belief that they have to conform to society’s precepts, and you just made a true revolutionary. Locking Dinesh up pissed him off, as you might expect.

So today I went for a bike ride, and got home read the Breitbart article above, and wrote this blog about Satanists supporting Planned Parenthood, supporting Dinesh D’Souza’s thesis and also banging a drum for my book. Someone has a case of the Wednesdays.

Buy and read The Complete Zombie World Order Trilogy. It’s all there, the whole NWO Agenda. I wrote it out in a Zombie novel because I want people to read the story and walk away knowing the truth. Some a-hole gave me a one star review on Amazon because he/she/it dislikes my sense of humor on Twitter. I had 7 “5 star reviews” in a row, totally legitimate from total strangers. Nobody I know likes me enough to give me a fake 5 star review on Amazon. Then I get “one starred” by some numbnut who admits they didn’t even read the book. I put my little heart and soul into those books, and get one starred by somebody who doesn’t read the book, doesn’t buy it. and calls me a racist. Yet, I called the whole New World Order Agenda in those books. Sad. Reading my books would have improved that mental deficient “reviewer”, more like a graffito-tagger of superior art.

 

 

Image result for charlottesville driver

For some reason, I’m thinking about The Warriors, that classic old movie which borrowed the plot of Xerxes’s seminal history, The Anabasis, to depict what could happen when a one large street gang tried to consolidate all NYC gangs into one army.

The story revolves around a gang of young toughs from Coney Island, who travel all the way to the Bronx for a mass gang rally, are then framed for the murder of Cyrus, the leader of the movement, and have to fight their way all the way back to Coney as every gang in New York is hunting them.

Yesterday’s action (#Charlottesville) will have some historical significance, as it looks like the gloves are finally off. There was a hit and run driver who killed at least one and injured several. He wore the uniform of one of the more militant factions there, and posed for pictures there.

Lets give some background, which you can skip if you have followed this at all. We once had what is called The Civil War, where everybody got down with killing each other to the tune of 800,000 soldiers and an unknown number of civilians. It was a total blood bath, decimating a good chunk of the population and leaving behind all the baggage second generation people inherit from such activity.

Its all quite relevant today, as California is actually putting Secession from the Union on the ballot next election, and if they withdrew, several other states might as well. So, the Civil War is still relevant today. California might withdraw so they could keep their large helot population of uneducated menial workers from other countries, particularly Mexico, since Trump is threatening to deport them all.

The South also wanted to keep their slaves, similarly to California. They were more honest about their motives, actually calling them slaves, not undocumented workers, but the cases are identical otherwise.

So the stated reason for the protest which led to mass rioting in Charlottesville this weekend was a protest over the removal of General Robert E. Lee from a park. Lee is inscrutable, but he appeared to mainly believe in States’ Rights, and chose to defend Virginny in the War over the USA (Union). To contemporize this issue, Colorado overrode Federal Mandates and Laws to legalize pot. Will the Feds let them get away with it?

This is a big deal. There is a Federal superstate, which will become ever more monolithic and domineering as the power of advanced statistical analysis and tracking is improved. There are individual States, which the Feds would like to make no more different than the names of their football mascots.

Back to the park. I’m being careful with my categorizations here, so let’s call them the “Pro-Statue People” filed for a permit to protest the statue’s removal in the park. Another group, the Ant-Statue People, showed up to counter-protest. The State, run by Federal shill Terry McAuliffe, completely mishandled the situation, shut down a legal protest, and groups started wandering through the city in chaos, fights breaking out as they went, until finally somebody blew a fuse and plowed their car into a pileup of cars.

I never protest, except for what you’re looking at. If it ever gets really real, yeah, I’ll be down, but I don’t look for trouble. My relatives fought for the Union, my grandfathers fought The Axis, and I can’t be a White Supremacist. For starters, the Anglo-Saxons types historically hate people such as myself. Just because I have such beautiful white skin, there is no reason for me to believe anything has changed. We had an Irish Catholic President who actually tried to change things and make things better for everyday people. They blew his head off after a couple of months. Obama made it 8 years, and that New World Order Tool is still running around being stupid and offensive, after running the country into the ground for two terms. Who is really hated in this country? Here’s Obama’s legacy, pasted below.

small_obamarecoveryin9charts

The other reason I can’t join the White Power types is I have mixed race children, and they are all I love. Why am I posting this? Because in our sick society, you can’t post an opinion without qualifying.

I am a Pro-Statue person. I think Lee was a great man, and I think The Civil War was stupid. I think Lincoln killed 800,000 Americans, and I find it deeply disturbing that he is considered a great president. The British got rid of slavery without wrecking their country. It could have been done here as well.

There are factions in both the Ant-Statue and Pro-Statue groups who are thugs for hire. George Soros is definitely one of the paymasters. One of the catalysts for the Civil War was also foreign provocateurs trying to escalate the situation for power and profit. We’re there today, still relevant.

So, while I distrust many Pro-Statue people, in principle, I agree with them, so long as our ships sail in the same direction. I have learned not to trust the Media at all, any of it, so I’m not brainwashable much (just don’t look, as they said on The Simpsons when malevolent ads came to life).

My take on what happened yesterday? My worldview is so deeply rooted in study, such hijinks effect me not a whit. Sorry about the dead girl and injured. I hope modern Americans never find out what real conflicts can lead to in sheer damage. Americans unfortunate enough to be alive when that buttmunch Lincoln was President certainly did.

At any rate, time to sell the donuts. Free book today to the first 1000 responders, clink link below. I can’t give the Zombie book away because I violated one of Bezos’s byzantine rules. #HowBezosMadeHisBillions

Quick and the Grateful Undead Kindle Edition

rick cover smaswords

giphy (2)

I had a dream last night which provided me with some insights, and it was to some extent troubling. While the basic message of it was fresh in my mind, I’m going to post it here as a mental record.

This will not be a dreamalog, though I like them and have posted them. It is mainly an insight into specifically why one girl I used to know was as angry as she was, at least with regards to her treatment of me. Let’s call her Rowana.

Rowana’s treatment of me varied. It wasn’t all negative and there were times when I think she sort of liked me. Usually, this kinder treatment came after I had resolved to ignore her. She didn’t want me to be oblivious, apparently.

She had moved into my best friend’s apartment, his girlfriend’s buddy, as a paying roommate type thing, so dealing with her and her hostility was a constant problem, since they all lived in the same building as me. I had been there first, and had helped my friend get situated there, which he repaid by having constant, wild parties, getting the police interested in my building, and moving in this extremely bitter girl who had a constant desire to “diss” me.

She had the pretty standard pretentious package girls of that era had when they wanted to appear intellectual and interesting. She had bisexual pretensions, vegan pretensions, Wiccan pretensions, psychedelic mushroom pretensions. She was angry and bitter, but she was also about 20 years old and built like a brick shithouse. I couldn’t ignore her.

She seemed to have a boyfriend, an obnoxious little rich kid who would visit her and then spend hours piloting a robotic motorcycle around in a parking lot next door. His parents supposedly had a big house up in the burbs, though I never got invited to one of the parties.

She used to chant my name for hours, putting some kind of hex on me. She had a vendetta, yet I honestly can’t recall what I ever did to her to deserve it. I never asked her out. I never hit on her. Why so angry?

Last time I saw Rowana she was nicer. She had moved out of town, and was back for a few days and was working at her girlfriend’s sandwich shop to make some extra money. She had gotten herself pregnant and was now a single mom.

I’m open to the idea that I was somehow to blame for this person hating me. Once after a long day when we had all been to New York, I very slowly walked behind her as she charged up the stairs to avoid interacting with me. At her flight, she waited for me, realizing the slowness of my ascent was designed to let her know I did not want to deal with her anymore that day.

“I’m sorry I’m such a bitch,” she said.

Not pausing, and continuing my ascent, I replied. “I’m sorry you’re such a bitch, too.” I meant it, at least.

So, her back story was the child of divorce. She may have been Jewish, but maybe just all her friends were, and its immaterial, I think. The insight I got from my dream is one reason women are so angry is the the culture of divorce. They don’t learn how to have positive interactions with men. Their moms’ are huge influences, and they have been through painful divorces. Men don’t understand relationships until they have been married for awhile, and that is a big part of the problem.

So, I have diagnosed the problem, but is there a solution? Could Society in a constructive way do something to promote marriage, resulting in less bitter and disillusioned men and women? Could Hollywood do more? Could the Media? Could marketing and advertising?

Have you ever looked for a house? Realtors keep their eyes peeled for “divorce houses” where a marriage breaks up and the home is on firesale as people are desperate to move on and cut their losses. It’s an economic tactic.

Look at Haiti. This poor nation is as conflicted as any divorcing family. Stuff is cheaper here, because people are desperate. This poor fellow killed himself rather than testify against the Clinton Foundation. His name was Klaus Eberwein.

Open your mind for a moment, as I had to. Think very clearly. Might there not be some very cold, calculating conspiracy to turn the USA into a giant divorce house so some predatory capitalists could swoop in and seize all assets? Doesn’t it seem like there is? Even if there wasn’t a concerted and designed conspiracy, might there not be a kind of thermodynamic entropic shift to disorder on a million small independent initiatives?

The USA is not all that far from Haiti, economically or geographically. I am not sad Rowana did not like me, I am sad she was unable to maintain a relationship with a decent person, at least to the extent she did not have to raise her child in relative poverty. Her personal failure is her fault, but she could have gotten a little help, and it all starts with sucking it up and not getting divorced on the part of those responsible. If people treated it like a lifelong commitment, there would be less marriage and less divorce. The secret would be to promote marriage and huge families for the people who aren’t going to screw it up. Better to have one family with twelve fairly functional children than 12 “families” producing angry and bitter malcontents. That would be a start.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hi Friends,

Primarily I have been using Twitter, hoping to cycle through this recent obsession before resuming my usual online activities, which include online chess, bioelectronics, and half-assed efforts to promote my books.

Anyway, Twitter exists in a state of perpetual outrage. There is always something, the world is always about to end (it actually is, be very afraid). Anyways, below is the billboard  from some *Canadian town, paid for with tax dollars which I saw on Twitter and motivated me to do some research.

My process was this: this was a strange, Soviet era style billboard, it looks like a political prisoner denouncing his former partners in a failed rebellion. It smacks of a confession from Orwell’s 1984, a blank and deadened face reciting a litany of social crimes, or a product of a Maoist re-education camp.

The defenders of this billboard (I posted their defense below, along with an opposing viewpoint), stress that this man made his confession of his own free will, and it was not forced out of him. Well, we can be thankful for that much at least.

When I saw it, I thought “Someone should do some research and try to look into the background of the proponents of putting such a billboard on a public highway.” Then it occurred to me that nobody I trust as much as myself to be fair would do such a thing, and also it really is irresponsible to hope someone will do some advocacy when I am fully capable of doing some myself.

The sheer anonymity, the “Everyman” quality of the individual on the billboard is offensive. His unremarkable face, emblazoned against a red background (no surprises there) acts as a blanket denunciation of all white individuals. Although it was written “in his own words”, he is obviously not meant to represent merely himself, but by extension, all white people. This one is a no-brainer, folks.

So what is my problem? Why do I care? Well, I find it interesting that public monies were used for this. This billboard is part of a series, but this one is obviously designed to be effective and inflammatory propaganda, and it succeeds. The use of colors is no accident.  Check out news programs. The predominant color scheme on TV news is blue, psychologically proven to be soothing.

*Editors Note-False alarm, gang. I started on the assumption this was in California (Ca), and proceeded to be offended by it, since this is a pretty racist billboard. However, it turns out this is some teensy little crapulent burg in Canada, where everyone is white. This anti-racist series is just virtue-signalling on a pretty epic level. I have been to Canada, nice country, people are punks. Canadians are starting to get to me. Jim Carrey, Neil Young, the rest, you’re talented, but couldn’t you just get paid and go home? I just waited some time thinking i was doing something constructive, and this turns out to be Canada.

So, while I stand by the first few paragraphs, it’s Canada. It explains a lot. To the Saskatoon City Council-one final thought to mull over–true white privilege is for people who live in 90% white communities and therefore have the privilege to celebrate diversity. Live in the hood for six months, take 6 lousy months of your pathetic Canadian lives, and go live in a “diverse” city like Newark or sections of New York I lived in for years. I’ll take your lecture then.

billboard.jpg

Canada 2006 Census Population  % of Total Population
Visible Minority group
Source:[42]
European 164,970 82.8
First Nations 10,855 5.4
Métis 8,605 4.3
Chinese 4,185 2.1
Other visible minority 2,470 1.3
South Asian 2,210 1.1
Filipino 1,855 0.9
Black 1,825 0.9
Latin American 1,045 0.5
Southeast Asian 1,005 0.5
Inuit 60 0.0
Total population 199,385 100

Opposition Viewpoint I found online

Narrative Collapse

“White Privilege” is a conspiracy theory that blames white people for the shortcomings of non-whites. The terms “white privilege” and “check your privilege” as used, almost like racial slurs, to denigrate, stereotype, and scapegoat all white people.

Now the Canadian city of Saskatoon is using public tax dollars to promote this incendiary ideology. They have already spent $14,000 for the campaign in 2017. They have placed advertisements inside restaurants and bars, ads at bus stop shelters, and even giant billboards.

One of the billboards features local resident Jim Williams and a quote about recognizing his own white privilege. Another features a mixed race woman claiming she is viewed as less important than white people. Saskatoon Mayor Charlie Clark, and Director of Community Development Lynne Lacroix are defending the racially divisive billboards.

Saskatoon also published a large number of videos of local residents blaming white people for the shortcomings of non-whites. Saskatoon is 83% white and about 10% Indian or Indian/white mixed. Most of the rest are Asian. “Anti-Racism” leaders in Saskatoon are specifically blaming white people for making the Indian community less successful.

The official Saskatoon website is promoting videos by Tim Wise. This is a Jewish-American author who has become wealthy promoting the “white privilege” conspiracy theory. Wise has publicly confessed to being a former criminal. He says he operated a “fake id mill” while he was in college.

Wise has also publicly advocated violence. In 2012, he called on his followers to shoot members of the Tea Party movement in the face.

 

City of Saskatoon response

City of Saskatoon director of community development Lynne Lacroix defended the billboards on Monday.

Supportive Viewpoint from Saskatoon“It’s real people who live in Saskatoon. It’s not staged actors, nor did the city make up those quotes,” she said.

“These billboards were not intended to suggest that all people have to do the same thing or that all people are racist.”

The city spent a total $14,000 on its anti-racism campaign in 2017, up from $2,260 in 2015 and $5,521 in 2016.

This year’s campaign includes advertisements in eight transit shelters as well as bars and restaurants across the city.

During the launch, Mayor Charlie Clark said the campaign was about “building relationships and a shared understanding.”